<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is wrong with banking, part 1: the legal nature of banking contracts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cobdencentre.org/2009/12/banking-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cobdencentre.org/2009/12/banking-part-1/</link>
	<description>For honest money and social progress</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:09:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: News from Korea: Bank run fears engulf savings bank industry &#187; The Cobden Centre</title>
		<link>http://www.cobdencentre.org/2009/12/banking-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-22945</link>
		<dc:creator>News from Korea: Bank run fears engulf savings bank industry &#187; The Cobden Centre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 11:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cobdencentre.org/?p=1780#comment-22945</guid>
		<description>[...] Bank runs are only possible because banks, uniquely, operate in an environment of unconventional property rights, supported by central banks and the socialisation of risk. I explain further here: The legal nature of banking contracts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bank runs are only possible because banks, uniquely, operate in an environment of unconventional property rights, supported by central banks and the socialisation of risk. I explain further here: The legal nature of banking contracts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: British Proposal for Banking Reform: Fractional-Reserve Banking versus Deposits and Loans &#124; The Libertarian Standard</title>
		<link>http://www.cobdencentre.org/2009/12/banking-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8016</link>
		<dc:creator>British Proposal for Banking Reform: Fractional-Reserve Banking versus Deposits and Loans &#124; The Libertarian Standard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cobdencentre.org/?p=1780#comment-8016</guid>
		<description>[...] At present, as in the US, most of the money &#8220;deposited&#8221; with a bank may be lent out by the bank, even though the &#8220;deposit&#8221; is also available and guaranteed to the depositor. This centralized FRB practice of course results in inflation, the business cycle, moral hazard, and so on. Many Austrians also oppose FRB on the grounds that it has been, or tends to be, or inevitably will be, bound up in some type of fraud. Other Austrians&#8211;primarily, but not exclusively, those in favor of a private variant of FRB&#8211;maintain that FRB need not be fraudulent, and, indeed, that it can be very useful. (For pro-FRB Austrian views, see Selgin &amp; White, In Defense of Fiduciary Media &#8212; or, We Are Not Devo(lutionists), We Are Misesians!; for a competing view, see Jesús Huerta de Soto, Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles; Hoppe, Hülsmann &amp; Block, Against Fiduciary Media; Hoppe, How is Fiat Money Possible?-or, The Devolution of Money and Credit; Hülsmann, The Ethics of Money Production; idem, Free Banking and Fractional Reserves: Response to Pascal Salin; idem, Free Banking and the Free Bankers; idem, Has Fractional-Reserve Banking Really Passed the Market Test?; also see Steve Baker, What is wrong with banking, part 1: the legal nature of banking contracts.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] At present, as in the US, most of the money &#8220;deposited&#8221; with a bank may be lent out by the bank, even though the &#8220;deposit&#8221; is also available and guaranteed to the depositor. This centralized FRB practice of course results in inflation, the business cycle, moral hazard, and so on. Many Austrians also oppose FRB on the grounds that it has been, or tends to be, or inevitably will be, bound up in some type of fraud. Other Austrians&#8211;primarily, but not exclusively, those in favor of a private variant of FRB&#8211;maintain that FRB need not be fraudulent, and, indeed, that it can be very useful. (For pro-FRB Austrian views, see Selgin &amp; White, In Defense of Fiduciary Media &#8212; or, We Are Not Devo(lutionists), We Are Misesians!; for a competing view, see Jesús Huerta de Soto, Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles; Hoppe, Hülsmann &amp; Block, Against Fiduciary Media; Hoppe, How is Fiat Money Possible?-or, The Devolution of Money and Credit; Hülsmann, The Ethics of Money Production; idem, Free Banking and Fractional Reserves: Response to Pascal Salin; idem, Free Banking and the Free Bankers; idem, Has Fractional-Reserve Banking Really Passed the Market Test?; also see Steve Baker, What is wrong with banking, part 1: the legal nature of banking contracts.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: British Proposal for Banking Reform: Fractional-Reserve Banking versus Deposits and Loans</title>
		<link>http://www.cobdencentre.org/2009/12/banking-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8012</link>
		<dc:creator>British Proposal for Banking Reform: Fractional-Reserve Banking versus Deposits and Loans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cobdencentre.org/?p=1780#comment-8012</guid>
		<description>[...] At present, as in the US, most of the money &#8220;deposited&#8221; with a bank may be lent out by the bank, even though the &#8220;deposit&#8221; is also available and guaranteed to the depositor. This centralized FRB practice of course results in inflation, the business cycle, moral hazard, and so on. Many Austrians also oppose FRB on the grounds that it has been, or tends to be, or inevitably will be, bound up in some type of fraud. Other Austrians&#8211;primarily, but not exclusively, those in favor of a private variant of FRB&#8211;maintain that FRB need not be fraudulent, and, indeed, that it can be very useful. (For pro-FRB Austrian views, see Selgin &amp; White, In Defense of Fiduciary Media &#8212; or, We Are Not Devo(lutionists), We Are Misesians!; for a competing view, see Jesús Huerta de Soto, Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles; Hoppe, Hülsmann &amp; Block, Against Fiduciary Media; Hoppe, How is Fiat Money Possible?-or, The Devolution of Money and Credit; Hülsmann, The Ethics of Money Production; idem, Free Banking and Fractional Reserves: Response to Pascal Salin; idem, Free Banking and the Free Bankers; idem, Has Fractional-Reserve Banking Really Passed the Market Test?; also see Steve Baker, What is wrong with banking, part 1: the legal nature of banking contracts.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] At present, as in the US, most of the money &#8220;deposited&#8221; with a bank may be lent out by the bank, even though the &#8220;deposit&#8221; is also available and guaranteed to the depositor. This centralized FRB practice of course results in inflation, the business cycle, moral hazard, and so on. Many Austrians also oppose FRB on the grounds that it has been, or tends to be, or inevitably will be, bound up in some type of fraud. Other Austrians&#8211;primarily, but not exclusively, those in favor of a private variant of FRB&#8211;maintain that FRB need not be fraudulent, and, indeed, that it can be very useful. (For pro-FRB Austrian views, see Selgin &amp; White, In Defense of Fiduciary Media &#8212; or, We Are Not Devo(lutionists), We Are Misesians!; for a competing view, see Jesús Huerta de Soto, Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles; Hoppe, Hülsmann &amp; Block, Against Fiduciary Media; Hoppe, How is Fiat Money Possible?-or, The Devolution of Money and Credit; Hülsmann, The Ethics of Money Production; idem, Free Banking and Fractional Reserves: Response to Pascal Salin; idem, Free Banking and the Free Bankers; idem, Has Fractional-Reserve Banking Really Passed the Market Test?; also see Steve Baker, What is wrong with banking, part 1: the legal nature of banking contracts.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Earl of Caithness: &#8220;The Banking Bill fails to address the fault which has led to every major banking and currency crisis during the past 200 years&#8221; &#187; The Cobden Centre</title>
		<link>http://www.cobdencentre.org/2009/12/banking-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3942</link>
		<dc:creator>The Earl of Caithness: &#8220;The Banking Bill fails to address the fault which has led to every major banking and currency crisis during the past 200 years&#8221; &#187; The Cobden Centre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cobdencentre.org/?p=1780#comment-3942</guid>
		<description>[...] See also What is wrong with banking, part 1: the legal nature of banking contracts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See also What is wrong with banking, part 1: the legal nature of banking contracts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to avoid future encounters with financial meltdown &#187; The Cobden Centre</title>
		<link>http://www.cobdencentre.org/2009/12/banking-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3937</link>
		<dc:creator>How to avoid future encounters with financial meltdown &#187; The Cobden Centre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cobdencentre.org/?p=1780#comment-3937</guid>
		<description>[...] What is wrong with banking, part 1: the legal nature of banking contracts [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What is wrong with banking, part 1: the legal nature of banking contracts [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Luvvie Tax &#187; The Cobden Centre</title>
		<link>http://www.cobdencentre.org/2009/12/banking-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3925</link>
		<dc:creator>The Luvvie Tax &#187; The Cobden Centre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cobdencentre.org/?p=1780#comment-3925</guid>
		<description>[...] What is wrong with banking, part 1: the legal nature of banking contracts [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What is wrong with banking, part 1: the legal nature of banking contracts [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An honest money maiden speech &#187; The Cobden Centre</title>
		<link>http://www.cobdencentre.org/2009/12/banking-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1988</link>
		<dc:creator>An honest money maiden speech &#187; The Cobden Centre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 09:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cobdencentre.org/?p=1780#comment-1988</guid>
		<description>[...] Commons. The full text may be found here. The articles which most closely inspired the speech are here and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Commons. The full text may be found here. The articles which most closely inspired the speech are here and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to deal with the Banksters &#187; The Cobden Centre</title>
		<link>http://www.cobdencentre.org/2009/12/banking-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>How to deal with the Banksters &#187; The Cobden Centre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cobdencentre.org/?p=1780#comment-233</guid>
		<description>[...] What is wrong with banking, part 1: the legal nature of banking contracts [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What is wrong with banking, part 1: the legal nature of banking contracts [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

