The end of the EU

Last Friday, David Cameron came back from Brussels having rejected proposals to draft a new European Union treaty, having failed to get promises of adequate safeguards to protect Britain’s financial sector. But given that the UK has no veto over Brussels’ power to regulate anyway, the prima facie reasons presented to Parliament were therefore not crystal clear. However, Cameron must have been aware that ratifying a new treaty without safeguards was a non-starter, and the fact that the dominant mainland powers were not even prepared to consider them is a reflection of their lack of rational thinking rather than his. After all, they should have been briefed that any treaty changes now require a referendum under UK law, and given the EU’s self-aggrandising tendencies, any treaty changes would be a tough sell to Parliament – let alone the electorate.

What was proposed in Brussels was a typically dirigiste response to unwelcome economic reality. Perhaps the script intended was as follows: we go through the motions of imposing fiscal controls and responsibility, and that should be enough to get the European Central Bank – working with the International Monetary Fund if necessary – to release the money to continue to finance our political ambitions. This is not the direction of travel for the UK.

In political terms we are probably witnessing the end of an empire, and when such an event occurs it can be swift. Forward-thinkers need to look beyond the EU as an institution, and in this respect an alternative and as yet unrecognised future for Germany is evolving. She faces stagnant markets in Europe, declining markets in the US, but booming markets for her products in China, South East Asia and other emerging economies. Even if the eurozone does not break up, her economic motivations will lie increasingly elsewhere and the weaker EU members will remain an unwelcome burden.

Her biggest problem is France, a point not yet recognised by commentators and as yet untested in the markets. In the short-term, Sarkozy faces an election next May, which explains why he must stick like glue to Angela Merkel rather than cut government spending. But France also has to refinance the same amount of debt as the Italians before May: about €180bn, and half in the next two months. This is an impossible task without external help, because the major French banks which have always been coerced into buying French government bonds in the past are themselves in a critical condition. A short-term fix is urgently needed of which there is no sign as yet.

We have to trust that there will be a solution, but talk of treaty-change does not represent urgent action. Anyway, the French socialists, who look like winning May’s election, have said they will not ratify any new treaty – creating more doubt and uncertainty for markets. It does not take much imagination to see French bond yields rising to over 7%.

This is the mess that Cameron has disassociated himself from. It will not be long before this becomes more widely appreciated.

This article was previously published at

Tags from the story
, ,
More from Alasdair Macleod
In praise of Hayek’s masterwork
Friedrich von Hayek first published The Road to Serfdom in 1944. His...
Read More
2 replies on “The end of the EU”
  1. says: Bjarne G. Hücker

    Mostly I agree with the author’s statements. This is especially true regarding German economic interests. What I don’t understand is the passage “… we are probably witnessing the end of an empire…”. Which empire? The EU? If the EU had been an empire it was a rather impotent one. Just think about Libya. Without the UK’s and France’s willingness to go the whole way it would have been a show of indecisiveness.

    Also I would like to add a non-UK perspective to this article. Currently the schadenfreude about Britain’s self-removal from the EU decision making process is (at least in the German press) prevailing. That’s a pity. The same is true regarding the triumphant headlines about getting out of the mess in Europe. Will it be in the UK’s interest if the continent chooses even closer integration and more regulation? Where will be the market for British (financial) services if tax laws make them unaffordable or just uninteresting?

    Cameron’s move also poses a far greater danger to all of us (in and outside the UK): Where will be the counter-balance to France’s statist ways and Germany’s federalist vision for Europe? Which country will be able to stop the combined political power of France and Germany to beat smaller nations into submission? None if not the UK. In my opinion there’s a certain possibility that Cameron’s no to a change of the Lisbon treaty will be seen as the occasion when Britain left the smaller nations at the mercy of France and Germany and their uncontrolled political elites. It might make the continent into a sea of statist slavery without securing Britain as a beacon of freedom. Or to formulate it from my (German) point of view: I don’t want to be left alone on a continent where French and German politicians don’t find a counter-balance in more independent-minded British politicians.

  2. says: Paul Danon

    You write: “any treaty changes now require a referendum under UK law” but, as I understand it, British law requires a referendum only when powers are ceded to Europe. Of course, parliament is giving away powers almost daily, but that’s not by treaty. It’s chilling to know that France has as big a debt-refinancing problem as Italy – yet see how they pose and strut on the European stage.

Comments are closed.