The success of “credit easing” on its own terms

Click for Telegraph Story
Click for Telegraph Story

Today, the Telegraph reports, UK house price growth ‘approaching madness’:

The speed UK property prices are rising at is “approaching madness”, analysts have warned, after data showed house prices jumped 2.4pc in February, the biggest monthly increase in five years.

The rise, revealed in the latest Halifax House Price Index, outstripped analysts’ expectations of a 0.7pc rise, renewing fears of a house price bubble.

House prices advanced 7.9pc on an year-on-year basis, the figures showed, taking the average price across the UK to £179,872 and marking the strongest annual uplift since October 2007.

The Chancellor’s policies of “monetary activism” and “credit easing” including Funding for Lending and Help to Buy have, on their own terms, succeeded. According to Kaleidic Economics, the Austrian measure of the money supply is now expanding by over 12% year on year:

Click for Kaleidic's data
Click for Kaleidic’s data

Nothing has been learned since Hayek wrote Monetary Theory and the Trade Cycle. His preface could have been written today:

It is a curious fact that the general disinclination to explain the past boom by monetary factors has been quickly replaced by an even greater readiness to hold the present working of our monetary organization exclusively responsible for our present plight. And the same stabilizers who believed that nothing was wrong with the boom and that it might last indefinitely because prices did not rise, now believe that everything could be set right again if only we would use the weapons of monetary policy to prevent prices from falling.The same superficial view,which sees no other harmful effect of a credit expansion but the rise of the price level, now believes that our only difficulty is a fall in the price level, caused by credit contraction.

… There is no reason to assume that the crisis was started by a deliberate deflationary action on the part of the monetary authorities, or that the deflation itself is anything but a secondary phenomenon, a process induced by the maladjustments of industry left over from the boom. If, however, the deflation is not a cause but an effect of the unprofitableness of industry, then it is surely vain to hope that by reversing the deflationary process, we can regain lasting prosperity. Far from following a deflationary policy, central banks, particularly in the United States, have been making earlier and more far-reaching efforts than have ever been undertaken before to combat the depression by a policy of credit expansion—with the result that the depression has lasted longer and has become more severe than any preceding one. What we need is a readjustment of those elements in the structure of production and of prices that existed before the deflation began and which then made it unprofitable for industry to borrow. But, instead of furthering the inevitable liquidation of the maladjustments brought about by the boom during the last three years, all conceivable means have been used to prevent that readjustment from taking place; and one of these means, which has been repeatedly tried though without success, from the earliest to the most recent stages of depression, has been this deliberate policy of credit expansion.

On its own terms, systematic intervention in the market for credit has succeeded: it has restarted the Domesday machine which delivered us into this mess. Those of us who have studied Mises, Hayek and the other Austrian-School masters will know that our present economic system remains built on sand.

Written By
More from Steve Baker
Barack Obama accused of making ‘Depression’ mistakes – Telegraph
Barack Obama is committing the same mistakes made by policymakers during the...
Read More
2 replies on “The success of “credit easing” on its own terms”
  1. says: Paul Marks

    The economics of this is insanity. A credit bubble economy.

    As for stopping it…..

    Politically it is impossible before the general election (Mr Cameron and Mr Clegg are committed to it).

    After the election (whether the political party we are both members of is in opposition or not) Mr Cameron is going to have to be challenged as leader (if he does not retire gracefully).

    But, tragically, nothing can be done now.

    Savers are going to continue to be looted – and the structure of the economy is going to continue to be distorted by monetary expansion.

    And by fiscal madness – after all, for all the talk of “austerity” there is a fiscal deficit of close to 7% of GDP.

    Red Ed is going to solve none of this – he would make it even worse.

    So assuming that Scotland votes “no” in the referendum (thus making winning the next General Election rather difficult) real reform may be more that six years away.

    Nothing before the election of May 2015, then five years of Labour government if they win (making everything worse).

    In investment terms – all this is a massive “sell” indicator for the United Kingdom.

  2. says: John Doran

    Hi Steve, hope you’re well.

    Some questions:

    What’s your position on the Bradbury £, last used I believe when the banks were in trouble in 1913?

    Is it true that MPs are not allowed to ask questions about the BOE while in the House, & if so, why?

    Is the £ issued, at interest, by the private BOE, to the British Treasury, which I believe is the system used by the private Fed in the US?

    What do you know of Karen Hudes, whistleblower ex chief legal counsel of the World Bank?

    I’d like to recommend Bill Still’s 3.5 hr documentary, “The Money Masters”

    John Doran.

Comments are closed.