Currency devaluation and economic growth

According to popular thinking the key to economic growth is demand for goods and services. It is held that increases or decreases in demand for goods and services are behind rises and declines in the economy’s production of goods. Hence in order to keep the economy going economic policies must pay close attention to overall demand.

Now, part of the demand for domestic products emanates from overseas. The accommodation of this demand is labelled exports. Likewise, local residents exercise demand for goods and services produced overseas, which are labelled imports. Observe that while an increase in exports implies an increase in the demand for domestic output, an increase in imports weakens the demand. Hence exports, according to this way of thinking, are a factor that contributes to economic growth while imports are a factor that detracts from the growth of the economy.

From this way of thinking it follows that since overseas demand for a country’s goods and services is an important ingredient in setting the pace of economic growth it makes a lot of sense to make locally produced goods and services attractive to foreigners. One of the ways to boost foreigners demand for domestically produced goods, is by making the prices of these goods more attractive.

For instance, the price of an identical bag of potatoes in the US is $10 and €10 in Europe. Also, the exchange rate between the US $ and the Euro is 1:1. At the exchange rate of €1 to $1, a European can get for his €10 one American bag of potatoes.

One of the ways of boosting their competitiveness is for Americans to depreciate the US$ against the Euro. Let us assume that in response to the Fed’s announcement to loosen its monetary stance the rate of exchange falls to 0.5 Euro per $1. This means that $10 is now worth 5 Euro, which in turn implies that an American bag of potatoes in Europe is offered for 5 Euro, all other things being equal. Consequently, a European can now purchase for 10 Euro two American bags of potatoes instead of one before the depreciation of the US$. In other words, the purchasing power of Europeans with respect to American potatoes has doubled.

If we were to apply the potatoes example to all goods and services, one can reach the conclusion that as a result of currency depreciation, all other things being equal, the overall demand for domestically produced goods is likely to increase. This in turn will give rise to a better balance of payments and in turn to a stronger economic growth in terms of GDP.

Note that to lift foreigners’ demand Americans are now effectively offering two bags of potatoes for one European bag of potatoes. This also means that the price of the European bag of potatoes in the US is now twice as much as before the depreciation of the US$. This most likely will lower American’s demand for European potatoes. In short what we have here as far as the US is concerned is more exports and less imports, which according to mainstream thinking is great news for economic growth.

Why boost in exports on account of currency depreciation cannot grow the economy

When a central bank announces a loosening in its monetary stance this leads to a quick response by participants in the foreign exchange market through selling the domestic currency in favour of other currencies, thereby leading to domestic currency depreciation. In response to this various producers now find it more attractive to boost their exports. In order to fund the increase in production, producers approach commercial banks, which on account of a rise in central bank monetary pumping are happy to expand their credit at lower interest rates.

By means of new credit producers can now secure resources required to expand their production of goods in order to accommodate overseas demand. In other words, by means of newly created credit producers divert real resources from other activities. As long as domestic prices remain intact exporters record an increase in profits. (For a given amount of foreign money earned they now get more in terms of domestic money).

The so-called improved competitiveness on account of currency depreciation in fact amounts to economic impoverishment. The improved competitiveness means that the citizens of a country are now getting less real imports for a given amount of real exports. While the country is getting rich in terms of foreign currency it is getting poor in terms of real wealth i.e. in terms of the goods and services required for maintaining peoples life and well beings.

As time goes by the effects of loose monetary policy filters through a broad spectrum of prices of goods and services and ultimately undermine exporters profits. A rise in prices puts to an end the illusory attempt to create economic prosperity out of thin air. According to Ludwig von Mises,

The much talked about advantages which devaluation secures in foreign trade and tourism, are entirely due to the fact that the adjustment of domestic prices and wage rates to the state of affairs created by devaluation requires some time. As long as this adjustment process is not yet completed, exporting is encouraged and importing is discouraged. However, this merely means that in this interval the citizens of the devaluating country are getting less for what they are selling abroad and paying more for what they are buying abroad; concomitantly they must restrict their consumption. This effect may appear as a boon in the opinion of those for whom the balance of trade is the yardstick of a nation’s welfare. In plain language it is to be described in this way: The British citizen must export more British goods in order to buy that quantity of tea which he received before the devaluation for a smaller quantity of exported British goods.[1]

Contrast the policy of currency depreciation with a conservative policy where money is not expanding. Under these conditions, when the pool of real wealth is expanding the purchasing power of money will follow suit. This, all other things being equal, leads to currency appreciation. With the expansion in the production of goods and services and the consequent falling prices and declining production costs, local producers can improve their profitability and their competitiveness in overseas markets while the currency is actually appreciating. Note that while within the framework of loose monetary policy exporters’ temporary gains are at the expense of other activities in the economy, within the framework of a tight monetary stance gains come not at any one’s expense but are just the outcome of the overall real wealth expansion.


[1] Ludwig von Mises, Human Action 3rd revised edition Contemporary Books, Inc p 791