Fortune Through Labour

“Tu fortunam laboribus indages”, what a Tuscan city can teach us about the cultural roots of capitalism and the challenges they face today.

By Elias Sanchez

On a trip through what many see as the heart of Western civilisation, I visited Siena, a medieval city in Tuscany. Its quiet streets hide a fascinating economic history. I stayed in the countryside near the Montaperti district, at a small restaurant and lodge called Le Pietre Vive. From the terrace, one could see the rolling hills of Tuscany stretching into the distance. The weather was clear, the landscape luminous, and the atmosphere calm. Yet what struck me most was not just the beauty of the place, but the economic life around it.

Talking to locals, observing small family businesses, and examining the city’s price structure gave me a revealing picture of everyday economic coordination. People seemed to live well. Small enterprises were active, prices appeared balanced, and despite heavy tax burdens on Italian businesses, many families sustained a decent standard of living. This leads to an important question: Why are some regions able to stay prosperous even when facing institutional challenges?

Siena and the Geography of Medieval Capitalism

Part of the answer comes from Siena’s place in history. The city sits along one of the most important historical routes connecting northern Europe with Rome: the Via Francigena. This medieval road ran from Canterbury, England, through Paris and the Alpine passes before reaching Rome. Siena became a key stop in Tuscany. Pilgrims, merchants, bankers, and diplomats often passed through. This steady flow of people brought chances for trade, finance, and new businesses. These interactions boosted the exchange of information and opened more business opportunities.

From the 12th to the 14th centuries, Siena grew into a thriving commercial republic. It became a hub in a network of long-distance trade, which helped local markets grow. This encouraged the creation of new financial tools and ways to manage commerce. This included merchant guilds, commercial courts, and systems to enforce contracts. One of the most enduring legacies of this period was the development of financial institutions. The city gave birth to the Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena, founded in 1472 and widely considered the oldest surviving bank in the world. The Bank of Siena is often mentioned as a key example of a city-run credit institution that lasted from the late Middle Ages into modern times. Yet its mention is not quite specific.

One leading economic historian, Raymond de Roover from Harvard, focused on Florentine merchant banking, but he discusses Siena indirectly when analysing the evolution of Italian banking institutions. In his work The Rise and Decline of the Medici Bank, 1397–1494, his main thesis is that Italian banks were merchant banks. They were not primarily deposit banks like modern commercial banks. Instead, they were merchant-finance houses that financed trade, handled currency exchange and issued bills of exchange. De Roover points out that banking started in independent city republics where merchants had political power. Municipal banks, like Monte dei Paschi founded by the Sienese state, came later and focused on public credit and agricultural loans. This was a later stage in the evolution of banking.

Robert Lopez, an Italian historian and economist, argued in his book The Commercial Revolution of the Middle Ages that Europe experienced strong economic growth from the 10th to the 14th centuries. This period laid the groundwork for later capitalism, with Italian cities acting as financial laboratories. Among these cities, Monte dei Paschi showed how financial practices that started in private markets became formal institutions.

Jesus Huerta de Soto, in his book Money, Bank Credit and Economic Cycles, especially in the chapters on medieval banking, focuses on Florence, Genoa, Barcelona, and Venice. He argues that early deposit banking began as simple “custody contracts”, in which merchants left gold with bankers for safekeeping. Complementing the analysis of Raymond de Roover. Over time, bankers realised they could lend out part of these deposits, which led to the evolution of fractional reserve banking. This change brought ongoing financial instability and credit expansion, as the analysis of this economic platform shows.

Trust and the Moral Foundation of Medieval Finance

Medieval commerce saw the emergence of new financial institutions such as merchant reputation systems, guilds, merchant courts, and credit networks. All of this in the name of generating Trust. Trust is relevant even in the philosophy of Dante, the father of the Italian language. In Inferno, Dante places fraudsters and traitors in the deepest circles of Hell because they violate the natural trust that makes human cooperation possible. One famous line (Inferno XI) explains why fraud is particularly evil: “Fraud, which is peculiar to man, displeases God the more.” The reasoning is that fraud corrupts the rational and social bonds that sustain human society. In commercial banking, this rationalisation of fraud was developed to facilitate trust in long-distance trade.

The name Monte dei Paschi literally refers to the pastures of the Sienese territory, which were used as collateral for the bank’s credit operations. This made it a municipal credit institution backed by public assets. The bank still exists, and there are various hypotheses to explain why it survived for centuries. One is public backing by the Sienese state. Another is conservative lending, where early activities focused on secured lending rather than speculative merchant finance, and loans tied to agriculture and local production, creating stable collateral.

Yet, this cultural rationalisation of fraud did not last long. After 2008, Monte dei Paschi survived the financial crisis, especially following the Antonveneta acquisition and hidden derivative losses, which triggered the crisis. The bank was saved by major government intervention, including bailouts, recapitalisation, and restructuring, all due to a buildup of bad loans. Despite the problems in modern Italian finance, the historical example of individuals trading freely within these systems remains important. Even if market signals are sometimes unclear, this issue goes beyond a typical Austrian analysis of financial structures.

Although historians generally agree that no single city invented capitalism, Italian city-states like Siena, Florence, Venice, and Genoa played a decisive role in developing the institutional infrastructure of commercial society: banking networks, credit instruments, accounting techniques, and merchant organisations. These structures, though shaped by erratic coordination signals from the modern state, were influenced by the commercial and entrepreneurial actions of individuals over time. Monte dei Paschi can be seen as one institutional outcome of a broader commercial transformation and coordination already underway in Italian city-states during medieval times. Yet, beyond financial structural innovation lies a deeper question: What cultural and moral foundations made these institutions possible?

The Moral Ethic of Labour

The answer may lie in a moral principle that appears carved into the intellectual and religious heritage of Western civilisation. The outside of the bank of Monte dei Paschi features Sallustio Bandini in the Piazza Salimbeni. An Italian economist, Catholic priest, and early economic reformer in Tuscany. Bandini is often considered a key precursor of liberal economic thought in Italy, advocating free trade in grain, reduced economic controls, and agricultural and commercial development. He is symbolically associated with economic reform and prosperity in Siena.

But the moral ethic driving his economic thought is found inside the magnificent Siena Cathedral, where one encounters a striking Latin phrase: “Tibi dixi, o fili, tu fortunam laboribus indages”(I told you, my son, to seek your fortune through labour). The sentence follows a classical didactic formula common in Roman moral discourse: a declaration of authority, a paternal address, and a moral instruction. The structure echoes the ethical tradition found in the writings of thinkers such as Virgil and Seneca, where virtue is associated with discipline, effort, and responsibility. For instance, Virgil stated that “fortune favours the bold”. In a Moral Letter to Lucilius, Seneca emphasises that “luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity”. In other words, fortune helps the brave, but virtue is achieved through effort. Philosophically, the latin phrase expresses a fundamental principle of classical ethics: Fortune is not passively received; it is actively pursued through effort. In Greco-Roman thought, labour and industria were moral virtues. Romans believed that virtue came from discipline, labour, and responsibility. This ethic was closely tied to agricultural life, military discipline, and civic duty. Prosperity was seen not as luck but as the result of diligence and perseverance. 

The key verb in the sentence is indagare, which means to track, search, or hunt. The metaphor is powerful: fortune must be tracked down like a hunter pursuing prey. Such phrases were commonly used in family inscriptions and civic monuments.  In places like Siena, whose civic culture historically valued commerce, discipline, and enterprise, this message resonates with the idea that prosperity comes from productive activity rather than privilege. This metaphor anticipates something strikingly close to the Austrian economic conception of entrepreneurial discovery. Human beings act, search, experiment, and boldly discover opportunities that were previously unknown. In this sense, the moral language of Roman ethics resonates with the axiom of human action: individuals act purposefully to improve their circumstances.

Values and the European Economic Core

These cultural foundations help explain why regions of Western Europe historically generated dense networks of commerce and innovation. In 1989, the geographer Roger Brunet and the RECLUS research group coined the term Blue Banana to describe the economic corridor stretching from London through the Rhine valley to northern Italy. This belt includes cities such as: Amsterdam, Frankfurt, Zurich and Milan. These regions historically concentrated population, industry, finance, and infrastructure.

Economists often explain the economic development of this region through agglomeration effects: skilled labour pools, knowledge spillovers, dense supplier networks, and advanced transport infrastructure. But agglomeration alone does not explain why such clusters emerged in the first place. Behind these economic structures lies a cultural pattern: a social ethic that values effort, discipline, craftsmanship, and long-term orientation. The principle expressed in the phrase fortunam laboribus indages captures precisely this mentality.

The State and the Individual

Yet there is an important tension in modern Europe. The same regions that historically generated extraordinary prosperity have also become some of the most heavily regulated and politically centralised parts of the world. Modern states have developed vast systems of taxation, regulation, and bureaucratic oversight. These systems often claim to manage economic coordination from above. But the essence of capitalism lies elsewhere: in the decentralised actions of individuals pursuing opportunities through effort and creativity. The dilemma is therefore clear: Should economic coordination emerge from the knowledge and initiative of individuals, or from the planning and authority of political institutions? The prosperity of cities like Siena suggests that the foundations of wealth lie not primarily in political design but in the everyday industriousness of individuals.

Conclusion: The Enduring Spirit of Enterprise

Travelling through northern Italy after visiting Siena left me with a striking impression. Despite centuries of political change and growing bureaucratic burdens, the deeper cultural ethic of enterprise remains visible. This applies to both Western and non-Western societies. Small workshops, family businesses, local craftsmanship, and entrepreneurial initiative continue to shape the economic landscape. The spirit captured in the phrase indagare fortunam, to pursue fortune through labour, has not disappeared. It is embedded in the philosophy and literature that has driven and continues to drive modern capitalism and sustain our economic system. The real question for Europe is whether political institutions will allow this spirit to flourish or, over time, suffocate it through excessive control. Western civilisation was built not by bureaucratic planning but by countless individuals who believed that fortune must be pursued, discovered, and earned through effort. How long that spirit will survive remains an open question that should be addressed by heads of state in the Western world. 

Written By
More from Other Writer
For a Virtuous Free Trade: Edmund Burke’s Economic Vision
The following excellent piece is by Kai Weiss, a Research Fellow at the Austrian Economics...
Read More
Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *